On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:43:22 +0100, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:15:08 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/14/14 5:10 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
Any objection to my adding this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1180
?
If you have use for something like that in [math], I am fine with
it, but it should be called something else.
It's just happened that I could use this generalization
of something already in Commons Math.
The name "natural" for
the existing method is "natural" (pun intended) since it returns an
array representing the argument - e.g., natural(5) is {0, .., 4}
which *is* 5 in set-theoretic terms.
How about "sequence"?
Perhaps we could even already further generalize to
sequence(int size, int start, int stride)
OK?
I've committed it already, to be shipped with 3.4. :-)
Gilles
P.S. The "natural" method would still be defined as "sequence(n, 0,
1)".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
