The completeness and correctness ranges from feature to feature and file format to file format, eg. I wouldn't recommend it for JPEG images (as opposed to their metadata): http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-imaging/formatsupport.html
You can look through the issues to see what is outstanding/wrong. I wanted to make major API changes before the 1.0 release, to improve reading multiple images, better generic metadata handling, etc. But I wonder if that's better done in version 2.0? Damjan On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Mickley, Joshua R (Genworth) <joshua.mick...@genworth.com> wrote: > Greetings All, > > I am evaluating the use of Commons Imaging for a project involving image > conversion and manipulation. > > My question is around a timeline for an official release of Commons Imaging > and suitability for use in a Production environment. > > I am currently using the SNAPSHOT version and am curious what bits of > functionality are needed prior to releasing the code. The unit testing I > have achieved to date gives me a good impression but I wanted to inquire and > gain some additional insight. > > Let me know if there are any specific areas where I can help contribute. > > Thanks! > -Josh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
