On 11/10/2014 02:16 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> If we updated:
>
> public interface BinaryEncoder extends Encoder {
>
> /**
> * Encodes a byte array and return the encoded data as a byte array.
> *
> * @param source
> * Data to be encoded
> * @return A byte array containing the encoded data
> * @throws EncoderException
> * thrown if the Encoder encounters a failure condition
> during the encoding process.
> */
> byte[] encode(byte[] source) throws EncoderException;
> }
>
> to:
>
> public interface BinaryEncoder extends Encoder {
>
> /**
> * Encodes a byte array and return the encoded data as a byte array.
> *
> * @param source
> * Data to be encoded
> * @return A byte array containing the encoded data
> * @throws EncoderException
> * thrown if the Encoder encounters a failure condition
> during the encoding process.
> */
> byte[] encode(byte[] source) throws EncoderException;
>
> byte[] encode(ByteBuffer source) throws EncoderException;
>
> }
>
> (and the same for BinaryDecoder)
why not make a NIOBinaryEncoder interface that extends BinaryEncoder and
adds the new method?
This would allow us to stay on the 1.x branch.
Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
