IMO, RAT should be used for headers since that is its job. We can stop using that feature from Checkstyle.
Gary On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Bernd Eckenfels <e...@zusammenkunft.net> wrote: > (apologies if I sent this twice, I thought I had mailed it, but looks > like it is not in my archives) > > Hello, > > currently the site builds of [VFS] trunk fail, but not only on Java 8, > but also 6-9. It looks like it is caused by some of the dependency > updates done in the last few weeks (Gregory?). > > I tried to fix it, there is one obvious fix (removing the no longer > supported <module name="DoubleCheckedLocking"/> from checkstyle.xml. > > But this does not fix all problems, there is still a problem with the > header comparer of checkstyle. I think it is related to relative path > and module builds. > > If I remove the <module name=Header>... as well, it builds again. Do we > need that, or dont we use RAT for that, anyway? > > So the last problem is the suppression file, which has also some > relative path problems. > > I will file an JIRA for it, but I wanted to get the discussion started. > > Gruss > Bernd > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
