On 16.10.14 02:06, sebb wrote: > On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >> Perso I don' get the point to use this version number at the end of >> the artifactId > > The idea is that if the package name has to be changed again, i.e. to > org.apache.commons.jcs2, then the artifactId would become commons-jcs2 > so that they agree with each other.
I consider this rule a bit strict, to be frank. I'd like to think that the problem of a broken API could be solved differently (by deliberately renaming API classes for example) but i can live with it for now. Bye, Thomas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
