On 16 October 2014 00:47, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > as the groupId has changed org.apache.jcs -> org.apache.commons.jcs.
No, the groupId is now org.apache.commons ArtifactId: jcs => commons-jcs Also the package name has changed: org.apache.jcs -> org.apache.commons.jcs > Perso I don' get the point to use this version number at the end of > the artifactId The idea is that if the package name has to be changed again, i.e. to org.apache.commons.jcs2, then the artifactId would become commons-jcs2 so that they agree with each other. But that's not necessary unless we need to break binary compatibility again in a future release. > > On 16 October 2014 09:26, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Same here (no version) >> Le 16 oct. 2014 00:02, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebo...@apache.org> a écrit : >> >>> Le 15/10/2014 23:54, Gary Gregory a écrit : >>> > Hm, no, the last item to agree on is the artifact Id. So... Some folks >>> like me like commons-jcs2 and other(s?) commons-jcs. >>> >>> My preference goes to commons-jcs without the version appended. That's >>> not technically required. >>> >>> Emmanuel Bourg >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
