On 21 July 2014 22:14, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > On 21/07/14 14:05, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> >> If I understand well this is a kind of specification API? The actual >> implementations will be done in Jena/Marmotta/OpenRDF? > > > With the current scope yes, that the overall idea. But we do not discard to > include some actual code in the future for whatever will be needed. >
We may have JSR330 @Inject annotations to inject providers into commons-rdf, so that we can have helper methods available there, based on the injected implementations. We are not likely to standardise on a given implementation, as the implementation of these classes may need to be finely tuned to work efficiently with each application and for each database. In the context of OpenRDF, there are multiple implementations of the current API, including a default one that is provided alongside the interfaces as "ValueFactoryImpl/etc.". We may provide a similar general-purpose RDFTermFactoryImpl etc. implementation for similar purposes, but it won't be used for the internals of the RDF databases that reuse the model: https://bitbucket.org/openrdf/sesame/src/b4c240904cfb371b4adee21c75cbd8ec5b0586ac/core/model/src/main/java/org/openrdf/model/ Marmotta for instance define there own implementation of the OpenRDF Model API, and convert instances created by other implementations to their own at the boundaries of their application for interoperabilty: https://github.com/apache/marmotta/tree/master/libraries/kiwi/kiwi-triplestore/src/main/java/org/apache/marmotta/kiwi/model/rdf Cheers, Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
