Hi we should be as before now excepted we use ReentrantLock instead of synchronized and method using a single structure (actually the map in practice) which relies on ConcurrentHashMap thread safety.
Build passes locally (not sure why continuum is not happy but it was the case before). BTW I have a question, I wanted to compare performances between previous jcs and trunk and I first used org.apache.jcs:jcs but it seems it is old (performance were 4000 times slower. Did I do something wrong, what is the last release I should compare to the current trunk? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-05-29 10:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org>: > On 28.05.14 13:47, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > I'm convinced of it (why the comment was this way). I'll try to rework it > > this week based on the LockFactory we spoke about in another thread. > > Please try to make sure that your conviction is proven by some unit test. > > Bye, Thomas. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
