On 5/26/14, 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC.
> There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made
> available.
>
> BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/ (svn
> revision 5419)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1032/
>
> Details of changes since 1.9.1 are in the release notes:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/beanutils/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/beanutils-1.9.2-rc1/changes-report.html
>
> The tag is here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/beanutils/tags/BEANUTILS_1_9_2_RC1/
> (svn 1597453)
>
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~oheger/beanutils-1.9.2-rc1/
> (note some *relative* links are broken and some new directories are
> not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
>
> KEYS:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
> Note: There is a known issue with some tests related to memory leak
> detection failing on some environments. This has already been the case
> for the previous release; there were no changes in this area.
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 2000
> GMT 29-May 2014
>
> [x] +1 Release these artifacts
Tested "mvn clean test" with
OSX 1.7.0_55, maven 3
Linux 1.5.0_22 maven 2
"ant clean test"
OSX 1.7.0_55
sigs, hashes, release contents all look good.
Running under m2, Linux 1.6.0_43, I got this error on one run:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Your JVM is not releasing
SoftReference, try running the testcase with less memory (-Xmx)
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase.forceGarbageCollection(MemoryLeakTestCase.java:496)
at
org.apache.commons.beanutils.memoryleaktests.MemoryLeakTestCase.testMappedPropertyDescriptor_MappedMethodReference2(MemoryLeakTestCase.java:232)
but IIRC this is a transient error and the message describes what is
going on. The second run did not produce the error.
Phil
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
