On 23 May 2014 17:59, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we just need to promote vfs-cifs and mark jcifs optional. That > complies with Apache's policy
ASF policy requires that downstream consumers should not be forced to use non-compatible depenendencies. Such dependencies are allowed if the product is still usable without. ASF policy does not allow us to bundle such a dependency with VFS. The ASF policy of "no surprises" means that non-compatible dependencies must not be automatically downloaded either. The consumer must be made aware that the dependency is not available under the ALv2. I suspect it will be necessary to use something other than 'optional' to achieve that - for example 'provided'. > -D > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Moved. >> >> Gary >> >> <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: sebb < >> [email protected]> </div><div>Date:05/23/2014 10:27 (GMT-05:00) >> </div><div>To: Commons Users List <[email protected]> >> </div><div>Subject: Re: [vfs] support JCIFS </div><div> >> </div>On 23 May 2014 15:24, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Also wondering... why can't we deliver our code even if the jar we depend >> > in the POM on has an incompatible license? I can understand that it is >> > undesirable philosophically, but is it disallowed? >> > >> > Should we create a separate module for these providers? What would it be >> > called? >> >> This is really a conversation for the dev list ... >> >> > Gary >> > >> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Bernd Eckenfels <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> I Wonder if we should add the sandbox providers to the normal >> >> providers.xml with a existence condition, so you get it preconfigured as >> >> soon as the JAR is on the classpath. >> >> >> >> (i noticed there is some Service discovery plugin stuff in the >> >> StandardfileSystemManager, but I guess this will not pick up the sandbox >> >> Lib?) >> >> >> >> > Am 23.05.2014 um 06:42 schrieb Gary Gregory <[email protected]>: >> >> > >> >> > It's up to you ;-) is not included in the main project because of the >> >> license IIRC. >> >> > >> >> > Gary >> >> > >> >> > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Sandhya >> >> Rajagopalan <[email protected]> >> </div><div>Date:05/22/2014 >> >> 18:30 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: >> >> [email protected]</div><div>Subject: >> [vfs] support JCIFS </div><div> >> >> > </div>Hi, >> >> > When are you going to support JCIFS? I see this is your sandbox. Can I >> >> add jcifs in providers.xml to start using it? >> >> > >> >> > -Sandhya >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition< >> http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
