IMO toes does not belong in lang. It's too much like the bean validation framework. It has potential to leak into a giant pile of methods with support for all doors of objects and data types.
Providing what java 7 has in Objects should be the limit, more or less. Gary <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Duncan Jones <djo...@apache.org> </div><div>Date:05/13/2014 16:06 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> </div><div>Subject: [lang] Any objections to LANG-1012? </div><div> </div>Hi, Does anyone have any objections to me implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1012? The goal is to introduce: Validate.isFalse() Validate.largerThan() // isLargerThan() ?? Validate.smallerThan() // isSmallerThan() ?? The isFalse() is just the natural counterpart to isTrue(), much like JUnit added assertFalse(). The other two methods are slightly neater ways of expressing "x >= y" or "x <= y" type constraints. Without these, one either writes: Validate.isTrue(x >= y); or Validate.inclusiveBetween(y, Long.MAX_VALUE, x); Neither of which is as concise as it could be. Duncan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
