Sebb, maybe I missed the context of the proposal. If the @since 1.0 is on the class, there's no need for it to be on methods unless the methods are of another version. I think that's the standard javadoc way from Oracle anyway.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed. > > The point about not knowing where a missing annotation means it was > forgotten or whether it means ab initio may perhaps work with classes. > > However once a class has an @since marker, there's no way of telling > whether its method and field @since markers are deliberately or > accidentally omitted. > > The only way to deal with that would be to insist on @since markers > for every class, method and field. > > > On 27 March 2014 15:27, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1. Due to the package change and fundamental shift from ProxyFactory > > as abstract class to interface, arguably everything (or very nearly > > so) is @since 2.0 anyway. > > > > Matt > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:22 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Whilst removing the @author tags I noticed that there are 39 @since > >> markers, all are @since 1.0. > >> > >> I think we should remove these. > >> > >> If not, then we need to add @since markers to identify what has been > >> added since. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Cheers, Paul
