On 19 March 2014 21:57, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's not really lost, is it? It can easily be restored. When I do so, > will you withdraw your -1?
It so happens that the doap is referenced by projects.a.o so it is obvious when it disappears from its original SVN location. I have no idea whether anything else has gone missing from trunk, so it's impossible to say whether restoring the doap is suffiicient, or whether other useful/essential files are no longer present in trunk. Sorry but at present I cannot withdraw my -1. > Matt > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 19 March 2014 18:30, <mben...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Author: mbenson >>> Date: Wed Mar 19 18:30:46 2014 >>> New Revision: 1579340 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1579340 >>> Log: >>> make 2.0 branch into trunk >>> >>> Added: >>> commons/proper/proxy/trunk/ >>> - copied from r1579339, >>> commons/proper/proxy/branches/version-2.0-work/ >>> Removed: >>> commons/proper/proxy/branches/version-2.0-work/ >>> >> >> -1 >> >> This has lost at least one important file, i.e. the DOAP. >> >> I've not checked to see if there were any other casualties. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
