The Assertions class works fine and it serves its purpose. There is no
need to make the library dependent on another library.
Going that route, as a developer/user of the library, I would be forced
to download and install two libraries instead of one. So it is more
complication and work for me.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 3/3/2014 12:07 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Adrian
2014-03-02 8:03 GMT+01:00 Adrian Crum <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>:
On 3/1/2014 9:33 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
I don't like the idea of creating some kind of component hierarchy, where
components higher up may depend on lower levels libs. This should be
decided for every individual case.
I agree. If I just want some basic low-level library, I don't want it to
have a multitude of silly dependencies.
One of the main problems with this community is the
top-down-one-size-fits-all mentality. It just makes things a lot harder
than they should be from a user's/developer's perspective.
I don't understand what you mean with this. Can you explain some more?
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
