On 2014-03-02, sebb wrote: > On 1 March 2014 19:53, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've said it before: doocracy. If someone wants to take on the work to >> provide 1.5 support, they've widened the audience of the component, which >> should be seen as a win if it didn't cause anyone else a problem.
> Which is what I just did; I fixed the test code so it still compiled > with Java 1.5. Thanks you for that, BTW. > I do wish people would stop taking that as an opportunitty to suggest > a completely unnecessary move to a later version of Java. FWIW I agree with you on this. We've tentatively agreed to move to Java7 with Compress 2.x and I personally don't see any real benefit of moving to Java6 at this point. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
