On 2/17/14, 9:57 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 17/02/2014 16:15, Ted Dunning a écrit : >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Emmanuel Joliet >> <ejol...@sciops.esa.int>wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-870 >>> >>> " Recently, many problems have been found out with class ..." >>> Please, consider not removing it. >>> We use it heavily and need the class as it gives what we need (handling >>> the input of course is necessary regarding NaN and infinities!). >>> I understand the problem of an incorrect/improper handling of NaN/Infinity >>> conditions but can't justify to remove the iterfaces/classes completely? >>> Isn't it?? > For now, the classes are still there and will remain at least as long as > we release versions in the 3.x series. The next version will be 3.3, so > the classes will still be there. > >> >> Yeah... welcome to commons math. >> >> It does seem like an extreme sanction to me. > I agree. I think we get over zealous here regarding NaNs, as it seems > all other libraries simply ignore this, and it seems to be a widely > accepted way.
+1 - lets just doc the limitations as best we can and keep this stuff. Phil > > best regards, > Luc > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
