On 2014-01-27, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I've planned to do some work on IO after [lang] 3.3, but you know how > it often turn's out with my plans ;-) so I cannot promise anything.
tell me - I'll go MIA for most of the next two or three weeks, I'm afraid. > One thing I don't understand is: are you suggesting to put the Bytes class > into [io] and then define a dependency from [compress] to [io]? Maybe there > is more that can be moved from [compress] to [io]? First of all I'd likely create a channels package in [io] and turn all those inner classes into top-level ones, but apart from the details, yes, that's the idea. The current [compress] codebase has already copied bigger chunks of IOUtils and some stream classes from [io]. Whether we intend to keep copying stuff around for [compress2] or simply make [io] a dependency is something I see as a separate issue. One that wants to get addressed, though. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
