The clirr breakage needs to dealt with / explained in the release
notes.  As it stands, the statements about compatibility are not
correct.

I think the breakage is OK, but would appreciate suggestions on how
to document in the release notes.

Phil

On 12/23/13, 9:21 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Pool 2.1 RC1 is available for review here:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-019/
>
> Details of changes since 1.6 are in the release notes:
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> The tag is here:
>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_2_1_RC1/
>
> Site:
>   http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/ 
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Epsteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/>
>   (Broken links to Javadoc versions expected)
>
> Clirr Report:
>   http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/clirr-report.html 
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Epsteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/clirr-report.html>
>
> RAT:
>   http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/rat-report.html 
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Epsteitz/pool/pool-2.1-rc1/rat-report.html>
>
>   Please review the release candidate and vote.
>   This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Phil
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to