On 29 Nov 2013, at 19:21, sebb wrote:
I agree that the Javadoc pages could be removed.
Although it would not be difficult to fix the individual pages,
there's not much point in fixing Javadoc for dormant components.
However I'm not sure it makes sense to delete the entire website
because of the branding issues.
What are the particular branding issues that you think need fixing?
Footer is not correct, should be like:
"Apache Foo, Foo, Apache, the Apache feather logo, and the Apache Foo
project logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of The
Apache Software Foundation in the United States and other countries."
First mention of a trademark should be with Apache, like Apache xmlio
(not only xmlio).
There are surely more things. I am not sure if it really helps to remove
the website alone. People could refer to their own build when it comes
to legal problems and indicate their only source is doing $x. Not really
an expert on these things. However I would like to have us compliant to
the branding recommendation.
Cheers
Cheers,
Christian
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
