On 29 Nov 2013, at 14:09, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 29/11/2013 12:20, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
This in fact means:
create a master branch which is stable.
create a develop branch which is not so stable.
create feature branches from develop where you work out your changes.
We are just swapping the branch names here, in the end your model
isn't
very different from mine. Let's say the develop branch is named
'master', the stable branch is named '1.x' or 'stable' and we are
basically dealing with the same workflow.
It's not my model, its the model described here:
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
This is a model many people follow. Having a development branch which is
called master
will confuse a lot of people. Its like using a svn branch as trunk.
We should respect the naming conventions of git as good as possible.
Cheers
Christian
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
