Hello. Are there criteria about filling the "due-to" attribute of an issue record in the "changes.xml" file?
Current practice seems that reporting an issue does not by itself warrants such an attribution. Indeed, as I understand it, the attribute is a place-holder for when an issue is fixed by a contributor who hasn't commit access. IMHO, this implies that the reporter (or another contributor) provided a patch or non-trivial insights that led to the fix. IOW, when a developer with commit access fixes a bug or implements a feature request mostly by himself, the name of the original reporter should not appear in the release notes, as if he were the contributor. Regards, Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
