On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:26 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 October 2013 11:10, Henning Schmiedehausen
> <henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote:
> > [haven't done that in a long time. Please bear with me...]
> >
> > Bug fixes and minor enhancements from configuration 1.9.
> >
> > So I would like to release configuration 1.10.
> >
> > Configuration 1.10 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/ (svn
> revision
> > 3321)
> >
> > Maven artifacts are here:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-019/commons-configuration/commons-configuration/1.10-RC1/
> >
> > Details of changes since 1.9 are in the release notes:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration/RELEASE-NOTES-1.10-RC1.txt
> > Changes file:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~henning/configuration-1.10-RC1/changes-report.html
> >
> > Site: http://people.apache.org/~henning/configuration-1.10-RC1/ (The
> JIRA
> > report will be fixed for the release)
> >
> > The tag is here:
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_10RC1/(svn
> > revision 1534569)
> >
> > Clirr Report (compared to 1.9):
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~henning/configuration-1.10-RC1/clirr-report.html
> > RAT Report:
> > http://people.apache.org/~henning/configuration-1.10-RC1/rat-report.html
> >
> > KEYS: http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> >
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> >
> > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 1100
> GMT
> > 25-Oct 2013
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [X] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
> The release artifacts and jar files should not have RC1 in them.
>
Yes, Gary said the same thing. I am still surprised that consensus is that
we should build artifacts with the final version from the RC. But that is
easily done.
>
> The NOTICE file is wrong, it should be "developed at" not "developed by"
>
Well, it was changed only on trunk. I can fix this.
>
> Some SVN files are missing from the source release:
>
> build.properties.sample
> build.xml
>
Yes. I doubt that the ant build still works. I will kill them from the repo.
>
> The above should either be removed from SVN or included in the source
> release.
>
> The following are missing, but that is not a problem:
> doap_configuration.rdf
> PROPOSAL.html
>
Proposal is the 10 year old "let's move that out of Turbine into commons".
Whee, I was already around when that was created. :-) The doap file is an
internal file and should not be in the release.
>
> Otherwise, the RC looks OK - it builds and tests OK with Java 1.5
>
> I did not check the site build.
>
> >
> > Thanks!
>
Thanks for looking at the build,
Henning
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
