On 18 October 2013 16:05, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Le 18/10/2013 16:51, sebb a écrit : > >> -1 >> >> Sorry, but I don't think this is wise. >> The groupId is a critical aspect of each component; it's vital that >> this is explicit. > > Well, it's explicitly defined in the <parent> declaration just above, > isn't it?
Yes, but the parent groupId does not *have* to be the same as the component groupId; indeed there are several components for which this is not the case. And it would be potentially possible to switch to a parent with a different groupId. If the component groupId is omitted, it is not clear whether the omission is accidental or deliberate. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
