Agreed. Keep it simple. On Thursday, October 10, 2013, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 01:36 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> Le 10/10/2013 13:26, Ate Douma a écrit : >> >> Thoughts? >>> >> >> A solution could be to change the package for every preview release. >> Something like: >> >> org.apache.commons.**experimental.<componentname><**number> >> >> So, for CSV we could release a 0.8 and 0.9 version under the packages: >> >> org.apache.commons.**experimental.csv8 >> org.apache.commons.**experimental.csv9 >> >> The package translation could probably be automated by the shade plugin, >> such that we keep developing with the org.apache.commons.csv package. >> > > While doing this might be somewhat automated, sure, I still would not > favor this. > I think it tries to solve more of a perceived than an actual problem. > And it is not convenient for the experimental end-users either, because > they most definitely will HAVE to modify their code (manually). > > >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
