Agreed, there are folks working on [pool] and [dbcp] pretty recently, Mark Thomas and Bill Speirs off the top of my head.
Matt On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > Pool and dbcp sounds ok for proper imo > Le 9 oct. 2013 21:20, "Dan Tran" <dant...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > VFS has no release for a couple of years. Would you consider it as > proper? > > > > -D > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think Phil came up with the idea to try to focus on the components > that > > > we are able to maintain and put all other stuff to dormant. Here is the > > > list of components that I think really are proper: > > > > > > - CLI > > > - Codec > > > - Collections > > > - Compress > > > - Configuration > > > - CSV > > > - Daemon > > > - DBCP (?) > > > - Email > > > - Functor > > > - Imaging (?) > > > - IO > > > - JCI > > > - Lang > > > - Logging > > > - Math > > > - Net > > > - Pool (?) > > > - Proxy > > > - SCXML (after recent interest) > > > - VFS > > > - Weaver > > > > > > All other stuff can go dormant because there is currently nobody who > > > maintains it. Still a pretty long list. Thoughts? Anything missing? > > > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > -- > > > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > > > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > > > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > > > http://github.com/britter > > > > > >
