[Top-posting] Please remember to include the [MATH] prefix in the subject line, as I have done in this reply.
On 15 August 2013 20:22, Ajo Fod <ajo....@gmail.com> wrote: > Sometimes, the simplest constructor for a class requires parameters that > there is an obvious default choice for: > > One such example is: > *NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer<http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/optim/nonlinear/scalar/gradient/NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer.html#NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer%28org.apache.commons.math3.optim.nonlinear.scalar.gradient.NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer.Formula,%20org.apache.commons.math3.optim.ConvergenceChecker%29> > *(NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer.Formula<http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/optim/nonlinear/scalar/gradient/NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer.Formula.html> > updateFormula, > ConvergenceChecker<http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/optim/ConvergenceChecker.html> > <PointValuePair<http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/optim/PointValuePair.html> >> checker) > > The docs say that > *POLAK_RIBIERE<http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/optim/nonlinear/scalar/gradient/NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer.Formula.html#POLAK_RIBIERE> > * is chosen most often. So, why not have a no parameter constructor that > makes default choices? > > This default constructor will make it easier for users to use these classes. > > Cheers, > -Ajo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
