On 1 August 2013 23:32, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 01/08/2013 21:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : >> I agree with Gary. This sounds like a useful feature that doesn't seem to >> be to hard to implement. And if he (Gary) has the time to do the necessary >> coding, why not? > > Because you start with getBoolean(), then you add getInt(), getDate(), > getList(), methods with a default value... and you end with an insanely > big class. We did that for [configuration] and I don't think [csv] > should follow this path.
+1 Converting strings to primitives is out of scope for CSV. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
