On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I haven't checked the current code, but the intended behavior was: > > - no args: the first record defines the header and is not returned when > iterating > > - args: the header is defined independently of the data, all the records > are returned when iterating > Yeah, that's too clever IMO. I expected the same behavior WRT record reading with the only difference being if I let the parser guess or not. The current code now always reads the header line if you set any non-null header. If you call withHeader() with no args it is a non-null call with an empty String[]. The idea being that if I use headers and I ask the parser to guess or give it the headers, I do not need to have the header line as a record. I plan on adding a setting that allows the header record to be saved for callers who care. Gary > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 30/07/2013 22:23, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Actually, if you use withHeader(), no args, you _cannot_ get back the > first > > record, so that makes skipHeader=false not possible without making the > > parser track the first record separately. > > > > In the interest of simplicity, I am going to make it simple: if you use > > withHeader of any kind, then the first record is read. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
