On 21 April 2013 21:30, Thomas Neidhart <thomas.neidh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/21/2013 09:20 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 21 April 2013 16:21, <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Author: tn > >> Date: Sun Apr 21 15:21:45 2013 > >> New Revision: 1470311 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1470311 > >> Log: > >> Suppress deprecation warnings for ArrayStack usage. > >> > >> > > Surely the code should use whatever the replacement is? > > I deprecated ArrayStack as it is obsoleted by the Deque interface of > Java 6. As we still target Java 5 for collections, I decided to keep it, > as there is no other non-synchronized LIFO stack available (unless you > use a plain LinkedList). > > But we could also decide to target Java 6 for collections 4? > > Would it not be better to leave the deprecation until the code actually needs Java 6? There's nothing Java 5 users can do about the deprecation, so it's currently just noise. Thomas > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
