On 6 April 2013 14:04, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I just noticed a minor mistake in this release, the version number in > the build.xml file is still 3.1-SNAPSHOT. > > Is there a way to get the build file generated automatically when > preparing a release? > > Is the Ant build file still needed?
> Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 02/04/2013 22:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.2, based on release > > candidate 5. > > > > This version fixes numerous bugs and adds a few features. > > > > You can retrieve the various parts here: > > > > Sources, binaries and release notes: > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/> (svn revision > 1728) > > > > Maven artifacts are here: > > > > < > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-053/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.2/ > > > > > > Details of changes since 3.1.1 are in the release notes: > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt> > > > > < > http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/changes-report.html > > > > (will be available only tomorrow morning European time) > > > > Tag: > > > > <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_2_RC5/> > > (svn revision 1463704) > > > > Site (will be available only tomorrow morning European time): > > > > <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/> > > > > All reports (CLIRR, RAT, findbugs ...) : > > > > < > http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC5-site/project-reports.html > > > > (will be available only tomorrow morning European time) > > > > Note that the PMD report shows several violations. A few of them are > > false positive (unused method, unused field). A number of them are > > voluntary (overriding method that simply calls super) because what we > > really need in these cases is to add specific javadoc in the overriding > > method. The remaining errors correspond to unused parameters. They are > > known and correspond to deprecated method that will be removed in 4.0. > > So despite the report is not perfectly clean, in fact everything that > > could be fixed in it has already been fixed. > > > > Votes, please. > > This vote will close in 72 hours: 2013-04-05T21:00:00 UTC > > > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > > [ ] +0 OK, but... > > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > Thanks! > > > > Luc > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > >
