I recommend changing code coverage to jacoco with a skip.jacoco property. [see http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCD7CB15 7.23020%25charles_honton%40intuit.com%3E for reasons]
Regards, chas On 4/4/13 1:03 PM, "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >CP 28 moved Cobertura to a profile called "reporting". > >The profile was activated by default, but could be disabled by using > >-DskipReports=true >or >-P!reporting > >IIRC, the idea was to move expensive (long-running) reports to a profile >that could be disabled if necessary. > >However Cobertura causes problems with some projects, and the project >seems >to be unmaintained, so perhaps it would be sensible to disable Cobertura >by >default. >In which case the profile and property should be renamed to reflect the >fact that it only affects Cobertura. > >Possibly even drop Cobertura entirely from the parent POM. > >However, I think it is important that some code coverage tool is used. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
