On 3/29/13 3:34 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.2, based on release
> candidate 2.
>
> This version fixes numerous bugs and adds a few features.
>
> You can retrieve the various parts here:
>
> Sources, binaries and release notes:
>
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/> (svn revision 1670)

Seems RELEASE_NOTES.txt has the wrong heading - does not match the
last commit to trunk, still referring to -SNAPSHOT.  Also it is
missing the description and using the default cheezy format, not
what the .vm generates (which includes the description, better
format and a better footer).  I guess this does not work anymore? 
Looks like it did in 3.1 and 3.1.1.

Unfortunately, the release notes title and missing description are
showstoppers for me, so -1 for the package as is.

Sigs and hashes are good and release contents and build look good to me.

Phil


>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-035/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.2/>
>
> Details of changes since 3.1.1 are in the release notes:
>
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/math/RELEASE-NOTES.txt>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC2-site/changes-report.html>
>
> Tag:
>
> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_2_RC2/>

You mean 3_2 above.
> (svn revision 1462526)
>
> Site:
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC2-site/>
>
>
> All reports (CLIRR, RAT, findbugs ...) :
>
> <http://people.apache.org/~luc/commons-math-3.2-RC2-site/project-reports.html>
>
> Note that the PMD report shows several violations. A few of them are
> false positive (unused method, unused field). A number of them are
> voluntary (overriding method that simply calls super) because what we
> really need in these cases is to add specific javadoc in the overriding
> method. The remaining errors correspond to unused parameters. They are
> known and correspond to deprecated method that will be removed in 4.0.
> So despite the report is not perfectly clean, in fact everything that
> could be fixed in it has already been fixed.
>
> Note also that the CPD report shows *huge* duplications. This is normal
> as it correspond to complete packages that are modified. As we are
> releasing only a minor version, compatibility prevents us from removing
> the older packages. The cleanup will occur in 4.0.
>
> Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours: 2013-04-01T22:30:00 UTC
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>   Thanks!
>
> Luc
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to