> > No, sorry, it's just not as safe. > > I'd rather a file be missing from the release than have a release with > a spurious file that could contain anything.
The only risk we have ATM is that the RM includes Idea's or Netbean's dedicated files - and produced archives are reviewed and voted, so if they contain a spurious file that contains whatever potentially dangerous - not just technically, but also under a legal PoV - vote is cancelled. > Once released, it cannot be unreleased. Whereas a missing file means at worst doing a point release. but that could be applied to other logic as well, the RM can potentially forget to include some required file - or not? http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
