Hi All: It seems to be that the B64 code needs work for 1.3 no matter what. So I am not sure I agree with Simo because: - We rework B64 for 1.3 as proposed by Sebb. - We rework B64 again for 1.4 using Java 6.
It seems like asking for trouble on subtle compatibility issues from 1.2 to 1.3 and again from 1.3 to 1.4. So proposal is to go with the longer term solution now and use Java 6. Gary On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: > My proposal is: let's go ahead with Java5 compatibility for 1.3, let's > increase for 1.6 in 1.4 or 2.0 > > > > > If we do not want to go with Java 6 and that method, we should > > probably treat concatenated encodings the same way it does. > > But of course we won't emulate the crash! > > > > +1 > > My 2 cents, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
