Why not depend on [codec] and shade, then?

Matt


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:

> How many gigs of ram do phone that run Java have these days?
>
> Gary
>
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 14:39, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 19 March 2013 18:32, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, why not depend on commons-codec?
> >
> > Codec is nearly 4 times the size of file upload.
> > Not an ideal partner.
> >
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Mar 19, 2013, at 14:28, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>>>> is there anything you want to discuss before I go ahead with a new
> RC?
> >>>>> I am performing some ITs in non-public projects and I planned to cut
> a
> >>>>> new RC in 1-2 days...
> >>>>
> >>>> I think there are still some issues in Base64Decoder (this time not
> >>>> ones I accidentally introduced - sorry about that!).
> >>>
> >>> don't worry, it can happen - unit tests saved us :)
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> For example, it does not seem to handle whitespace properly -
> >>>> certainly not in the last 4 bytes.
> >>>> Nor does it detect invalid characters in input - AFAICT these will be
> >>>> treated as binary (because the decoding table is initialised to 0).
> >>>
> >>> I am honestly not worried about white spaces, since those decoders are
> >>> not part of APIs and are used by the MimeUtility which tokenizes
> >>> strings by whitespaces
> >>>
> >>>> With the new  version of the code, skipped characters can cause array
> >>>> bounds errors after the main loop, because finish is calculated
> >>>> without taking skipped characters into account, thus the loop can
> >>>> consume additional bytes. In the original version, this would not
> >>>> cause array bounds errors, but the same byte could be used more than
> >>>> once.
> >>>
> >>> that is worrying
> >>>
> >>>> I think it really needs to be rewritten, which I am happy to do.
> >>>> I intend to fetch the bytes, skipping as necessary otherwise storing
> >>>> them in an array. When there are 3 bytes available, output them and
> >>>> resume.
> >>>> At end of input, output any remaining bytes.
> >>>>
> >>>> It remains to be decided how to handle '=' before the end of the byte
> >>>> data - does that signal end of input, or is it an error if '=' appears
> >>>> other than at the end?
> >>>> Indeed, should it handle whitespace at all, and if so are there
> >>>> restrictions where that may appear?
> >>>>
> >>>> QPD has problems too: it assumes that characters following '=' are
> >>>> hex, but does not validate this.
> >>>> It also fails to handle lowercase hex, which is not very tolerant.
> >>>> Also the exception messages aren't specific enough - cannot
> >>>> distinguish truncated encoded sequence from invalid CRLF pair.
> >>>> Again, I can take this on.
> >>>
> >>> I won't appose to a rewrite, but at that point, since both decoders
> >>> are buggy: what about adding a dependency to commons-coded? It already
> >>> handles both Base64 and QuotedPrintable codecs.
> >>> We could shading the interested classes, if we want to avoid less
> >>> dependencies as possible, but a dependency to another commons
> >>> component sounds fair to me.
> >>>
> >>>> Given that MimeUtil seems to strip spaces on input, do the decoders
> >>>> need to handle embedded spaces?
> >>>
> >>> not in my opinion, as I wrote before.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and best,
> >>> -Simo
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> >>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> >>> http://www.99soft.org/
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to