Sure! I hope anyway that a good part of common sense would stop RMs on going ahead in front of critical issues :P
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, but given that a release cannot be vetoed, it's probably better to > catch fundamental design problems earlier rather than later. > > Matt > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Simone Tripodi > <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote: > >> >> I 150% agree with you mate - it's pity here we regularly miss both the >> >> `early` and the `often` :) >> > >> > The downside is that if you rush out a release and it contains a >> > broken API it will be very difficult to fix without causing problems >> > for end-users. >> >> that is why we vote releases, right? >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
