On 15 March 2013 10:37, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Fri Mar 15 10:37:01 2013
> New Revision: 1456871
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1456871
> Log:
> checkstyle: '256' is a magic number.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/mime/Base64Decoder.java
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/mime/Base64Decoder.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/mime/Base64Decoder.java?rev=1456871&r1=1456870&r2=1456871&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> ---
> commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/mime/Base64Decoder.java
> (original)
> +++
> commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/util/mime/Base64Decoder.java
> Fri Mar 15 10:37:01 2013
> @@ -48,9 +48,14 @@ final class Base64Decoder {
> private static final byte PADDING = (byte) '=';
>
> /**
> + * the decoding table size.
> + */
> + private static final int DECODING_TABLE_SIZE = 256;
> +
The Javadoc does not say why the value 256 is used, so the number is
still a magic number ...
> + /**
> * set up the decoding table.
> */
> - private static final byte[] DECODING_TABLE = new byte[256];
> + private static final byte[] DECODING_TABLE = new
> byte[DECODING_TABLE_SIZE];
In this case, I'm not sure that using a constant add any benefit as
the value was only used once.
I think Checkstyle is being too strict here; I suggest leaving this
change, but I don't see a need to fix everything the Checkstyle does
not like.
> static {
> for (int i = 0; i < ENCODING_TABLE.length; i++) {
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
