that's not natural true for spring i think *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/2/13 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > I'm not sure if this is needed in this case. > > The Java interceptors spec got moved out of EJB a long time a go and is > now a standalone spec which is used by CDI, Spring and guice. > The package is javax.interceptor and contains all the stuff we need. > > If we do it in a similar style than Apache MyFaces CODI and now Apache > DeltaSpike does it with the 'InterceptorStrategy' [1] then we are > completely free of any container specific code. > > > LieGrue, > strub > > [1] > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-deltaspike.git;a=blob;f=deltaspike/core/api/src/main/java/org/apache/deltaspike/core/spi/InterceptorStrategy.java;h=a772152c46ae589572c6bb2bfb0292a8e980b2d3;hb=HEAD > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:39 PM > > Subject: Re: commons-monitoring? > > > > WRT a Commons Interceptor API, [proxy] defines Interceptor and other > > related interfaces. > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> basically having a commons.Interceptor api can be interesting then we > >> simply need to map to spring and cdi > >> > >> this is done in shiro for instance and works very well > >> > >> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >> > >> > >> > >> 2013/2/13 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org> > >> > >> > 2013/2/13 Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> > >> > > >> > > Benedikt, > >> > > > >> > > On 13 févr. 2013, at 08:49, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > >> > > > Commons components usually don't have any dependencies. > > How would you > >> > > > implement this under this restriction? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I've never seen this written before. Have you? > >> > > > >> > > >> > Yes, on the commons website [1]: > >> > > >> > "Commons developers will make an effort to ensure that their > > components > >> > have minimal dependencies on other libraries, so that these > components > >> can > >> > be deployed easily." > >> > > >> > But you're right If you wanted to point out, that this is not an > > absolute > >> > must-have. We can have minimal dependencies. > >> > I guess (but I don't know!) it would be okay to have a dependency > > to the > >> > AOP alliance jars, for example to define a new MethodInterceptor [2] > > for > >> > monitoring. But IMHO it would be rather strange to have dependencies > > to > >> > org.springframework.aop to define a new MethodBeforeAdvice [3] for > >> > monitoring. > >> > > >> > Makes sense? :) > >> > > >> > Benedikt > >> > > >> > [1] http://commons.apache.org/ > >> > [2] > >> > > >> > > >> > > > http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/doc/org/aopalliance/intercept/MethodInterceptor.html > >> > [3] > >> > > >> > > >> > > > http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/3.0.0.M1/javadoc-api/org/springframework/aop/MethodBeforeAdvice.html > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > paul > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > >> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > >> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > >> > http://github.com/britter > >> > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
