Thanks Gary -- ya, manpower is always an issue! I'll poke around and see what makes sense -- I just wanted to make sure I'm not duplicating an effort that is already underway somewhere.
Thanks Ryan On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote: > Well, that's an interesting question. > > It's really a man-power issue. > > One project I envision could be to port all of the [vfs] providers to the > new Java 7 framework. That is no small undertaking. I can imagine a "VFS > 3.0" or "7.0" that would only deliver Java 7 file system providers and no > framework (like we currently do). That would break with the current code > base as I imaging it might be too "hoopy" (as in having to jump through too > many hoops, I just made that up) to re-use some core code between a Java 7 > provider that delegates to said core and the current VFS framework that > would delegate to the same core. That would be ideal, but I'm not sure how > nice or needed that would be. > > Right now, I'd like to release a [vfs] 2.1 as there are a LOT of changes in > trunk since 2.0. > > Like everybody else, I'm busy with a family, a job, and hobbies... > > All that being said, a house is built one brick at a time, so this could be > started with one provier... > > Volunteers welcome! > > Gary > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Are there any plans for VFS to integrate with the Java 7 Path API? > > > > I stumbled across: > > http://truevfs.java.net/ > > > > It looks interesting, but I like the wider support in commons VFS. > > > > thanks > > ryan > > > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
