On 12/28/12 8:12 AM, Dimitri Pourbaix wrote: > Luc, > >> So in order to make sure I understand your point, you would be OK >> if I >> deprecate the non-diagonal weights, in which case users needing this >> would have to implement it themselves by premultiplication (as >> both you >> and Konstantin seem to propose)? > > Yes, exactly. > >> Sure, but for the record the feature was also a last minute >> change. This >> was discussed on the list, and the final decision was to add this >> feature despite the release was close. No wonder we failed to >> test it >> thoroughsly. > > Last minute? I have been discussing this with Gilles for several > months.
Relevant project discussion happens *on this list* > >> We don't expect our releases to be perfect. We do our best, with the >> resources we have. > > I perfectly understand this but focusing those resources less on > rules > and more on real cases might help. As stated before, you are more than welcome to *become* one of these resources. Phil > > Regards, > Dim. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Dimitri Pourbaix * Don't worry, be happy > Institut d'Astronomie et d'Astrophysique * and CARPE DIEM. > CP 226, office 2.N4.211, building NO * > Universite Libre de Bruxelles * Tel : +32-2-650.35.71 > Boulevard du Triomphe * Fax : +32-2-650.42.26 > B-1050 Bruxelles * NAC: HBZSC RG2Z6 > http://sb9.astro.ulb.ac.be/~pourbaix * > mailto:pourb...@astro.ulb.ac.be > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
