thanks for the explanation, I'll have a look at it! :) all the best, -Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >> Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? > > You could do both. Currently the only 'plugin' for the weaver is Matts > privilizer. This one only 'enhances' an existing class. But there is no > further restriction and I see no reason why you could not generate classes. > But please note that this classes are only available _after_ the compilation. > So they cannot (sanely) be referenced by any java source code. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> >> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >> Cc: >> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 1:16 PM >> Subject: Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module >> >> Hi Mark! >> >> until v3.2 the Digester supported runtime annotations to generate the >> XML parser - the idea was having a processor that generates the XML >> parser at compile-time, but unfortunately I haven't had enough time to >> continue working on it... >> So, since it is even broken and still at the early stage, I propose to >> drop it to cut soon a new release, and postpone it to new versions. >> >> Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? >> >> TIA, >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >>> I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a >> candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ? >>> It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class >> directly. >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> >>>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM >>>> Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module >>>> >>>> Hi all guys! >>>> >>>> the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal >>>> status for a looooong time and I haven't had time/chances to make >> it >>>> working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as >>>> heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone >>>> submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make >>>> the build work (and possibly cut a release). >>>> >>>> Any objection? >>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best! >>>> -Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
