On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 04:09:54PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 12/16/2012 04:03 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >> On 12/16/2012 01:42 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> Please have a look at the Commons Math 3.1 release candidate. > >>> > >>> Note about the web site: I've now found that the problem reported in > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-912 > >>> originates from not updating > >>> src/site/site.xml > >>> For this RC, I manually changed the "index.html" in the staging area (so > >>> that the site will have the link to the new apidocs named correctly). > >>> As this does not touch the artefacts, I hope that this small glitch[1] > >>> will > >>> not require a new RC.[2] > >>> > >>> ---------- > >>> Tag: > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_RC1/ > >>> > >>> Site: > >>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1/RC1/ > >>> > >>> Binaries: > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-023/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.1/ > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release it. > >>> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care. > >>> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ... > >>> [x] -1 No, do not release it because ... > >> > >> there are several clirr errors reported in: > >> > >> * DifferentiableUnivariateFunction > >> * LogNormalDistribution > >> * NormalDistribution > >> > >> which are not clear to me, and are also not mentioned in the release notes. > > > > I agree that in the first instances, no change should have been done (the > > more so that they are modifications of deprecated methods). > > > > The last two are false positives, for some unknown reason. > > > >> Some findbugs warnings have been introduced due to the copy of classes > >> to the new optim package, the exclude list should be adapted. > > > > Done. > > > >> > >> the changes.xml does not specify a release date for 3.1 > > > > Done. (Look at the date! ;-) > > > >> the tagged pom.xml does not specify the correct scm connection (to the > >> final release tag) - just a minor glitch. > > > > I don't quite understand this one. [IIUC, I don't see why those should be > > adapted to the tag (which is not supposed to be changed).] > > If someone thinks that this is really a release blocker, please give an > > explanation on the reason (and the right way to update it). > > It is just a minor thing, but I found it in one of the release guides. I > think most of the releases have missed it so far. The scm links should > be updated to the final release tag, e.g.: > > <scm> > > <connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</connection> > > <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</developerConnection> > > <url>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1</url> > </scm> > > I do not think it is a blocker, but when you prepare the next RC you > could also adapt these links.
It was not in my release recipe (and probably not in "UsingNexus" on which I based my previous, and first, attempt to prepare a release). So I'll wait for a rationale. [IMHO, and IIUC (which is not sure of course), in CM, there is reason not to point people to a tag...] Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
