I just noticed the deprecation fixes broke backward compatibility. 
Sorry I will fix that too.

Phil
On 12/11/12 7:54 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/11/12 3:26 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 05:36:07AM -0000, pste...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: psteitz
>>> Date: Tue Dec 11 05:36:06 2012
>>> New Revision: 1420000
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1420000&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Added RealDistribution methods to EmpiricalDistribution.  JIRA: MATH-672.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>     commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
>>>     
>>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/EmpiricalDistribution.java
>>>     
>>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/EmpiricalDistributionTest.java
>>>
>>> Modified: commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml
>>> URL: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml?rev=1420000&r1=1419999&r2=1420000&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml (original)
>>> +++ commons/proper/math/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml Tue Dec 11 05:36:06 
>>> 2012
>>> @@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ This is a minor release: It combines bug
>>>    2. A few methods in the FastMath class are in fact slower that their
>>>    counterpart in either Math or StrictMath (cf. MATH-740 and MATH-901).
>>>  ">
>>> +      <action dev="psteitz" type="update" issue="MATH-672">
>>> +        Added methods to EmpiricalDistribution to implement the 
>>> RealDistribution
>>> +        interface.
>>> +      </action>
>>>        <action dev="tn" type="add" issue="MATH-897" due-to="Reid 
>>> Hochstedler">
>>>          DBSCAN clustering algorithm (in package "o.a.c.m.stat.clustering").
>>>        </action>
>>>
>>> Modified: 
>>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/EmpiricalDistribution.java
>>> URL: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math3/random/EmpiricalDistribution.java?rev=1420000&r1=1419999&r2=1420000&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> [...]
>>> +
>>> +    /**
>>> +     * Mass of bin i under the within-bin kernel of the bin.
>>> +     *
>>> +     * @param i index of the bin
>>> +     * @return the difference in the within-bin kernel cdf between the
>>> +     * upper and lower endpoints of bin i
>>> +     */
>>> +    @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
>>> +    private double kB(int i) {
>>> +        final double[] binBounds = getUpperBounds();
>>> +        final RealDistribution kernel = getKernel(binStats.get(i));
>>> +        return i == 0 ? kernel.cumulativeProbability(min, binBounds[0]) :
>>> +            kernel.cumulativeProbability(binBounds[i - 1], binBounds[i]);
>>> +    }
>> Is there any advantage to suppressing the deprecation warnings?
>> There are many other instances in the code. It could be construed that it
>> points to the current state of affairs: deprecated code is only used where
>> we cannot do otherwise because of backward-compatibility constraints.
> I am fine getting rid of the suppressions.  You are correct that the
> suppression is there only because there is no way to avoid the warning.
>>
>> Unrelated but in that same file:
>>  * The Javadoc mentions "RandomDataImpl" instead of "RandomDataGenerator".
> Thanks.  Need to fix that.
>>  * The Javadoc for constructor (line 191)
>>      public EmpiricalDistribution(int binCount,
>>                                   RandomDataGenerator randomData)
>>   
>>    mentions that "randomData [...] may be null, resulting in default JDK
>>    generator". But that instead results in NPE.
> Hmm.  I now see that introducing the super(generator) call to avoid
> deprecation warning broke the old contract.  I will fix that.  Good
> catch.
>>  * The constructor (line 164)
>>      public EmpiricalDistribution(int binCount,
>>                                   RandomGenerator generator)
>>    should call the one at line 191 instead of duplicating code.
> Yes.  Will fix.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gilles
>>
>>> [...]
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to