On 11/28/12 12:44 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > Hi all, > As long as I've been part of the Commons community I don't know that I've > encountered this exact situation: a committer adds some code to the > sandbox that is more or less complete. I don't know precisely what > requirements must be met before we promote [privilizer] to proper. We seem > to have interest from one or more members of the PMC as prospective users; > this would seem to imply that were I hit by a bus there ought to be someone > interested in maintaining the component. Speaking for BVal I intend to put > this component to immediate use there (that's what I wrote it for!). Mark > has mentioned that OWB and perhaps other ASF projects might want to make > use of it. What else do I need to do? > > Matt > Traditionally, we have just required a) community and b) close to release-ability. In the olden days, we used to like to see 3 committers interested in working on the thing. Looks to me like [privilizer] is in good shape on both accounts, albeit with the "3 committers" spread about the ASF. That is not a problem for Commons, IMO. I would be +1 to promote.
All you need to do is kick off a promotion vote. Phil P.S. I vaguely recall [primitives] having a similar birth some years ago. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
