On Nov 7, 2012, at 23:40, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/7/12 8:06 PM, James Carman wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> And it does not fit what I consider commons naming. Recall the recent
>>> rename from sanselan to imaging.
>>>
>> Yeah, we like to use more concrete names related to the problem domain
>> of the component.
>
> Yeah, but before the name was coopted for a mobile OS, "android" was
> a common synonym for "robot"  which is very descriptive ;)

When I saw the dated look of the site my brain went to physical robots
like Lego mind storms and the like :)

Commons Crawler would fit better IMO. Google wins the name recognition
game here.

>
> Other than sebb's (and my) comments that this *could* be a TLP, any
> other reasons that this code does not belong in Commons?

Nope but I do not see how it is not a better fit in Nutch.

>
> One thing for Richard et al to think / comment about:  joining us
> means helping out on reviewing other component releases, discussions
> like this, improving our release process, web site, etc.  Are you
> guys up for this?

Is the Droids community willing to help with Commons is the question.

Gary

>
> Phil
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to