Ted,

I am not sure I understand the problem with the fixed number of components.  My 
understanding is that CM prefers immutable objects. Adding a component to an 
object would require reweighting in addition to modifying the component list.  
A new mixture model could be instantiated using the getComponents function and 
then adding or removing more components if necessary.

Jared
________________________________________
From: Ted Dunning [ted.dunn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:21 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-816 (mixture model distribution)=?utf-8?B?LiAgICAu?    
=

Seems fine.

I think that the limitation to a fixed number of mixture components is a
bit limiting.  So is the limitation to a uniform set of components.  Both
limitations can be eased without a huge difficultly.

Avoiding the fixed number of components can be done by using some variant
of Dirichlet processes.  Simply picking k_max relatively large and then
using an approximate DP over that finite set works well.

That said, mixture models are pretty nice to have.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> Any objection to commit the code as proposed on the report page?
>   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-816
>
>
> Regards,
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Email Disclaimer:  www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
Consultation Disclaimer:  www.stjude.org/consultationdisclaimer


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to