I dont know if there is any read only public server. Can you just roll in cifs provider into the trunk for 2.1? I will be your first beta customer ( even thou we are already perform intensive test in house )
-D On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I could see releasing 2.1 ASAP which is on my to-do list. fixing We could > then roll out a 2.1.1 or 2.2 with this code in it. But there still would > need to be some kind of testing. Is there a public server that could be > used for at least read-only tests? > > Gary > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> perhaps, we can release smb provider as is at commons-vfs and mark it >> as experimental? I see a number of apache project doing that. >> >> -D >> >> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hello all, >> > >> > I took a closer look at writing unit test case for vfs-cifs and came >> > to a conclusion that the test cases are tough to develop since there >> > is no available embedded cifs server available ( note that the current >> > test cases for other provider heavily depends on embedded server like >> > ftp, sftp, webdav, etc ). And mocking the testcase up is not that >> > worth. >> > >> > So I would like to propose to release cifs provider as a beta together >> > with vfs-maven-plugin and have users to test it out. My company is >> > using intensively in house and about the bring it to full production ( >> > there fore I need to release vfs-maven-plugin at MOJO's codehaus soon >> > ) >> > >> > Any objection for me release it as propose using the same java package >> > name( org.apache.commons.vfs.... ) at codehaus? >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > -D >> > >> > Note I do have test case for cift using provided example pom >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> > Date: Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 4:49 AM >> > Subject: Re: Promote vfs-cift out of sandbox? >> > To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Dan Tran <dant...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> I have from now to Octorber to either: >> >> >> >> 1. Implement test requirement to graduate vfs-cifs out of sandbox at >> >> Apache common >> >> >> >> 2. Release it as a alpha/beta at Codehaus together with >> vfs-maven-plugin >> >> >> >> 3. Release to our internal repo. >> >> >> >> The prefer one is 1 >> >> >> > >> > So do I :) >> > >> > >> >> >> >> What is VFS 2.1 schedule? >> >> >> > >> > I would like to push out a 2.1 sooner rather than later. I still see some >> > internal clean ups I'd like to do. So it might be out in a month or two. >> Or >> > not, it depends on my schedule, priorities and feedback I get once I >> start >> > cutting release candidates. >> > >> > It's possible that by October, VFS will be on 2.2, 2.3 or greater. >> > >> > Gary >> > >> > >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -Dan >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Dan? What are your plans or intentions here? >> >> > >> >> > Thank you, >> >> > Gary >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Gary Gregory < >> garydgreg...@gmail.com >> >> >wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2012, at 12:11, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:38 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >>>>> Can the above be read as follows for VFS and JCIFS: you cannot >> >> copy >> >> >> the >> >> >> >>>>> JCIFS jar into VFS (which we do not) but the VFS POM can point >> to >> >> it >> >> >> (which >> >> >> >>>>> we do). >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> The above document is only proposed, not actual policy. >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> The following is the resolved list of questions: >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> In particular: >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >>>> "Will the majority of users want to use my product without >> adding >> >> the >> >> >> >>>> optional components? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> I do not see how this helps. It's yes or no: Can the VFS POM >> point >> >> to >> >> >> >>> a set of artifacts that are LGPL? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Whether the answer is yes or no depends on the answer to the above >> >> >> question. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > There are only a few file systems in VFS that should be considered >> >> >> required. All the ones that require the user to include a third-party >> >> jar - >> >> >> even if it is Jackrabbit's - are optional. We could easily include >> file >> >> >> systems that have dependencies on artifacts that are licensed under >> the >> >> >> LGPL or similar licenses (although I would still shy away from GPL'd >> >> works >> >> >> because of the FSF's interpretation of their license). >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The biggest issue I see with the stuff in the sandbox isn't >> licensing >> >> >> but if anyone will support it. >> >> >> >> >> >> Ok, so the short answer is yes, we can move to trunk. The issue is >> >> >> whether someone can bring the code up to par. That person sounds like >> >> >> the author of the original post. After that, it's up to the >> >> >> committers, like me, to keep up. >> >> >> >> >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ralph >> >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> >> > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >> >> > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >> >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >> > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 >> > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK >> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
