Hi Luc, 2012/8/23 Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr>: > Le 23/08/2012 05:16, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : >> Hi, >> in MATH-849, I have proposed an implementation of Gamma(x) >> (previously, class Gamma had only logGamma(x)). Gamma(x) is not >> defined for x negative integer. In such instances, I would like to >> throw an exception instead of returning Double.NaN. However, creating >> a new exception in o.a.c.m.exception seems exagerated, since it's very >> unlikely that this exception should be used elsewhere (or maybe). >> Should I define a nested exception instead [1]? >> >> What do you think of the name "UnexpectedNegativeIntegerException"? It >> does not really match the pattern of already defined exceptions, but I >> can't find a better name. > > Don't we already have NotPositiveException? > > Luc > We do, but Gamma is defined for all negative values, except integer ones... Sébastien
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
