On Jul 23, 2012, at 21:19, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
> It's been 3 years since Imaging 0.97 was released, > and many bugs have been fixed and many features added, > so I would like to release a long overdue Imaging 1.0. > > Imaging 1.0, RC2 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/ > > Maven artifacts are here: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/maven > > Details of changes since 0.97 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/changes-report.html > > I have tested this with JDK 1.6 using maven2. > > The tag is here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/imaging/tags/IMAGING_1_0_RC2/ > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/ > > Clirr Report is irrelevant - there is no source/binary/semantic > compatibility with 0.97. Since this is 1.0, I am more concerned with getting the API right than compatibility with a sandbox version. My question therefore is: are you happy with the API? I am traveling ATM and cannot dig into my IDE. I took a peek at the reports and there are a lot of issues reported by FindBugs, PMD and so on. What is the plan there? Gary > > RAT Report: > http://people.apache.org/~damjan/imaging-1.0-RC2/site/rat-report.html > > Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, Friday 27 July 2012 > at 02:00 GMT. > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thank you! > > Damjan Jovanovic > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
