Hi Simo,

That sounds good to me. However, I'm having trouble separating the
existing Catalog implementation from the rest of chain. Digester is
tightly coupled across components, so it is a non-trivial refactor to
make a configuration facade. I'm working on it, but it will take some
time.

Thanks,
-Elijah

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> Good morning all,
>
> so I continue proposing the already proposed roadmap: let's add the
> façade APIs for the [chain] configuration stuff, adapt the existing
> XML configuration reader, use the [configuration] in future releases
> for new [chain] configurations.
> How does it sound?
>
> best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Elijah Zupancic <eli...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> Configuration seems like it might be useful if I end up redoing the
>> XML configuration portion. Are there any plans to support YAML?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Elijah
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Simo,
>>>
>>> Am 22.07.2012 17:54, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
>>>
>>>> Good point Oliver,
>>>>
>>>> I honestly didn't think about [configuration], please apologize! since
>>>> [chain] already had a way to be configured via an XML wrapper around
>>>> the Digester, we thought it would have been good having a façade and
>>>> plug other textual format...
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, we are open to suggestions - what would fit better for you? Do
>>>> you already have some hints to share?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>>> -Simo
>>>
>>>
>>> nothing concrete. I saw that you mentioned an XML configuration module, and
>>> [configuration] contains a XMLConfiguration class. It also supports other
>>> configuration file formats, e.g. properties or ini files which can be
>>> accessed through the same Configuration interface.
>>>
>>> I don't know your concrete use cases. If you already have a working
>>> implementation based on Digester, there is probably not much benefit in
>>> switching to another API. But if you plan support for other configuration
>>> file formats, [configuration] may be worth a look.
>>>
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Oliver Heger
>>>> <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
>>>>>
>>>>> Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized. But
>>>>> maybe a source of inspiration?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just tracked CHAIN-72 and assigned to Elijah
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> best,
>>>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>>>>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Elijah and and I had a chat and we thought that, since chain2 hasn't
>>>>>>>> released yet, we are still in time to define a façade API for textual
>>>>>>>> configurations and rename the current XML configuration module to
>>>>>>>> xml-configuration (and adapt it to new API) - new formats such as YAML
>>>>>>>> and JSON will be included in future releases.
>>>>>>>> Any objection?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Elijah: if you have cycles to dedicate to it, I think the façade can
>>>>>>>> be defined in a o.a.c.chain.config package in the core module, in that
>>>>>>>> way it should be quick enough going to the first release - WDYT?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TIA!
>>>>>>>> -Simo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>>>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>>>>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to